2025:CGHC:53854 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12528 of 2025 1 - Satya Prakash Choudhary S/o Ramcharitra Ram Aged About 41 Years Presently Working On The Post Of In-Charge Circle Organizer, Janpad Panchayat - Sitapur Distt - Surguja Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Development New Raipur, Distt - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Commissioner Surguja Division, Ambikapur, Distt - Surguja Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector (Tribal Development) Surguja Ambikapur, Distt - Surguja Chhattisgarh 4 - Assistant Commissioner (Tribal Development) Ambikapur Distt - Surguja Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer Ambikapur, Distt - Surguja Chhattisgarh 6 - Block Education Officer Sitapur, Distt - Surguja Chhattisgarh 7 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat - Sitapur, Distt - Surguja Chhattisgarh 8 - Tikeshwar Chouhan Presently Working On The Post Of Hostel Superintendent (Grade-C Middle Level), Posted At Tribal Boys Ashram Bansajhal, Block - Batouli, Distt - Surguja Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Panel Lawyer KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Digitally signed by KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Date: 2025.11.06 12:18:54 +0530 Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 04.11.2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 17.10.2025 by which the petitioner has been transferred from the post of In-charge Circle Organizer Block – Sitapur to his substantive post of teaching at Govt. Primary School, Nadipara, Block – Batauli, District – Surguja. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that respondent No. 8 is hostel Superintendent who has been posted in his place whereas the petitioner has been given the charge after obtaining NOC from the Joint Director as well as the District Education Officer. Evenotherwise, he has been posted by the Commissioner, therefore, the Collector has no jurisdiction to transfer the petitioner to his original place of posting as teacher, therefore, would pray for setting aside the transfer order. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel would submit that the appointment of in-charge does not confer any right to the petitioner. The petitioner has been rightly transferred to his substantive post of teacher which does not warrant interference by this Court and would pray for dismissal of the writ petition. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with utmost satisfaction. 5. The petitioner has been transferred to his substantive post of teacher, as such, no service condition or fundamental rights of the petitioner has been violated. Therefore, I am of the view that no illegality or irregularity has been committed by the respondents in transferring the petitioner which warrants interference by this Court. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition (S) sans merits and it is dismissed. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge kishore