APHC010215292020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14205/2020 Between: 1. RAPOLU GOVINDA RAO, S/O. TIRUMALA RAO AGE. 62 ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC RETIRED GENERAL MANAGER IN RBI, HYDERABAD, R/O. FLAT NO.202, PRIYA ARCADE, INDIAN BANK LANE, SRI NAGAR COLONY, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD-500073. 2. RAPOLU RAGHAV, S/O. GOVINDA RAO AGE. 31 YEARS HINDU, MALE, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. FLAT NO.202, PRIYA ARCADE, INDIAN BANK LANE, SRI NAGAR COLONY, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD-500073. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICEKANDUKUR, KANDUKUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SINGARAYAKONDA POLICE STATION, SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. REGULAGADDA VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring action of the respondents 2 aggrieved by the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in not taking any action on my complaint dt.12.02.2020 against their high-handed activity of the 5th Respondent police officials in detaining and the petitioners in connection with Crime No.153/2019 Dt.08.08.2019 as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and violative of the provisions of Criminal procedure Code and also offends Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently punish the concerned police officials for illegal detention of Petitioners pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances.” ” 2. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on the last occasion i.e. on 12.09.2025. On 12.09.2025, the matter was directed to be listed to today. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:18.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.14205 of 2020 Dt.18.09.2025 Asr