AKHONE ASGAR AND ANR. v. STATE TH.LADAKH AFFAIRS AND ORS.
OWP/1629/2018 · 2025-07-16
Rahul Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5584 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5584 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 1629/2018
1. Akhone Asgar, age 71 years S/o Sheikh Ghulam Hussain,
2. Manpur Ali, age 52 years S/o Ali, Both residents of Karikitchoo, District Kargil
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate
Vs
1. State of J&K Th. Commissioner Secretary, Ladakh Affairs Department, Govt. of J&L, Civil Sectt. Jammu/Srinagar
2. Chief Elector Officer (Election Authority under Panchayati Raj Act, 1989), J&K, Jammu/Srinagar
3. District Election Officer/Chief Executive Officer, Ladakh Hill Development Officer (Deputy Commissioner) Kargil
4. Ladakh Hill Development Council, Kargil through its Chief Executive Officer, Kargil .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (16.07.2025)
01. Mr. Ashok Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners very candidly submits that the writ cause and purpose has been rendered infructuous with efflux of time, as such, this writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the rights of the petitioners or their legal representatives to file a fresh Serial No. 08
2 OWP No. 1629/2018
writ petition if any cause of action freshly accrues to them relatable to the grievance as set up in the writ petition.
02. Dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
16.07.2025
SUNIL
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No
Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No