Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55838 (PNJ)

JAVED HASAN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/25406/2025 · 2025-05-27

N S Shekhawat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-25406-2025 -1- 208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25406-2025 Date of Decision:27.05.2025 Javed Hasan …Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and another …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Mrigank Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.79 dated 05.06.2017, under Sections 406, 506 of IPC, registered at Police Station Bapoli, District Panipat. 2. While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court on 12.05.2025, this Court had noticed the following contentions:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the FIR in the present case was registered on 05.06.2017 and now after a delay of almost 08 years, the petitioner was sought to be implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further contends that the petitioner was working as a driver with Nakeem and had no concern with the allegations levelled by the complainant. He further submits that Nakeem has already been granted the concession of anticipatory bail by this Court in CRM-M-36690-2017.” HEMLATA 2025.05.27 23:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-25406-2025 -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated the submissions and further submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation may not be required. 4. On the other hand, reply has been filed by learned State counsel in Court today and the same is taken on record. Learned State counsel also submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 5. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the interim order dated 12.05.2025 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S. 6. Pending application(s) stand(s) also disposed of. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 27.05.2025 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2025.05.27 23:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document