APHC010363362015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32786/2015 Between: 1. KANDREGULA SRINIVASU, S/O K.KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC : EMU BIRDS FARMER, R/O.H.NO.7-135/1, GAVARAPALEM, GAVARAPET, KONTHIWADA, VEERAVARASAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 534 240. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS JOINT SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, DAIRYING & FISHERIES, KRISHI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI - 110114. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY & FISHERIES DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE 3. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER NABARD REGIONAL, OFFICE, RTC "X" ROADS, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. 4. THE DIRECTOR ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT FOR, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SHANTHI NAGAR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. 5. THE STATE LEVEL BANKERS COMMITTEE OF ANDHRA, PRADESH 2 JS,J W.P.No.32786/2015 STATE, REP. BY ITS CONVENER, ANDHRA BANK, PATTABHI BHAVAN, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. 6. THE BRANCH MANAGER, ANDHRA BANK, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BRANCH, BHIMAVARAM TOWN, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondent Nos.l to 5 in not considering the representations, dated : 04-11-2013, 23-12-2013, 05-06-2014, Nil, 20-10-2014 and 20-10-2014 of the EMU Bird farmers to waive the loans, which were sanctioned by the 3rd RespondentNABARD pursuant to the introduction of schemes by the 1 st Respondent-Central Government and also action of the Respondent No.6 Bank in insisting for repayment of loan amount, pending decision of 3rd Respondent-NABARD ON the recommendations made by the 5th Respondent-State level Bankers committee, dated : 14-02- 2014 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of principles of natural justice, and violation of Article 14, 19 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.6 Bank not to insist the petitioner for repayment of loan amount till a decision is taken by 3rd Respondent-NABARD on the recommendations made by the 5th Respondent-State Level Bankers Committee, dated : 14-02-2014 and further direct the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 to waive the loan, which was advanced to the petitioner by directing the Respondent No.6 Bank not to harass the petitioner for repayment of loans and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 42336 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.6 Bank not to insist the petitioner for repayment of loan amount till a decision is taken by the 3rd Respondent-NABARD on the recommendations made by the 5th Respondent-State Level Bankers Committee, dated : 14-02-2014, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 3 JS,J W.P.No.32786/2015 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 155371 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NARASIMHA RAO K S A Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M SRIKANTH REDDY 2. K JAGAN MOHAN REDDY 3. GP FOR FISHERIES (AP) 4 JS,J W.P.No.32786/2015 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through online and submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 05.11.2025 KAS 5 JS,J W.P.No.32786/2015 253 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32786/2015 Dated: 05.11.2025 KAS