APHC010211022020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 13890/2020 Between: 1. SIVVALA MOHANA RAO, S/O RAJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/O GURANDI VILLAGE, BHAMINI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 2. SIVVALA NOOKA RAJU, S/O LATE ADINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O GURANDI VILLAGE, BHAMINI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 3. SIVVALA TAVITI NAIDU, S/O LATE JAGANNADHAM, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/O GURANDI VILLAGE, BHAMINI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 4. DUPPADA CHIRANJEEVULU, S/O LATE MALLIKHARJUNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/O GURANDI VILLAGE, BHAMINI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 5. DUPPADA SIMHADRI NAIDU @ SIMHADRI, S/O LATE DHARMAPURI, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/O GURANDI VILLAGE, BHAMINI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 6. SIVVALA JAGADISH, S/O MOHANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O GURANDI VILLAGE, BHAMINI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 7. SIVVALA TARINAYYA, S/O LATE APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O GURANDI VILLAGE, BHAMINI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 8. SIVVALA SUGREEVULU, S/O LATE TARINI, AGED ABOUT 75 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.13890 of 2020 YEARS R/O GURANDI VILLAGE, BHAMINI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 9. POLISETTI BALAKRISHNA, S/O LATE ADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/O GURANDI VILLAGE, BHAMINI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 10. NETHALA HARICHANDRUDU, S/O LATE NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS R/O GURANDI VILLAGE, BHAMINI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 11. GANUGULA SUDARSHANA RAO, S/O LATE KASENNA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O GURANDI VILLAGE, BHAMINI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 12. PAPPALA KRISHNA RAO, S/O LATE SUNDARI, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/O B.C. STREET, GURANDI VILLAGE BHAMINI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 13. SETTI RAJA RAO, S/O LATE JAGABANDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/O B.C. STREET, GURANDI VILLAGE BHAMINI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRI50 YEARS 14. KEERTHI NOOKARAJU, S/O LATE DEENABANDHU, AGED ABOUT R/O B.C. STREET, GURANDI VILLAGE BHAMINI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 15. BUSAKALA MADHAVA RAO, S/O LATE RAMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/O S.C. STREET, GURANDI VILLAGE BHAMINI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 16. KEERTHI RAMA RAO, S/O LATE BARIKI, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/O MAIN STREET, GURANDI VILLAGE BHAMINI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AMARAVATI 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.13890 of 2020 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAKONDA SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 4. HE TAHASILDAR BHAMINI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P RAJKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.13890 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners from their respective land pieces to an extent of Ac.0.03, Ac.0.02, Ac.0.03, Ac.0.02, Ac.0.02, Ac.0.03, Ac.0.03, Ac.0.03, Ac.0.02, Ac.0.02, Ac.0.02 in Sy.No.93/1 and Ac.0.03, Ac.0.03, Ac.0.02, Ac.0.02 and Ac.0.02 in Sy.No.93/3 of Gurandi Village, Bhamini Mandal, Srikakulam District to provide house sites to the weaker sections under the “Navaratnalu-Pedalandariki Illu” Scheme without following the due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the respondent authorities concerned will follow the due procedure with respect to the subject land. 4. In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent authorities have not utilized the subject land for the above said purpose of the said scheme. 5. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land strictly in accordance with law and if the petitioners are otherwise found to be in possession of the same, they shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law, by giving due opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned and upon verification of the 5 HBKM,J W.P.No.13890 of 2020 records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 18.09.2025 PGT