HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 14912 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Nobody is present on behalf of petitioner to press this petition even in the revised calling of the list whereas Ms. Neha Khan, learned counsel on behalf of contesting-respondents as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents are present. 3. It is argued that during the pendency of the present petition re-counting has already been done, hence the present petition has now become infructuous. 4. Since nobody is present on behalf of petitioner, the present petition is dismissed in default. September 18, 2025 Arti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Panchu Ram Maurya, Shashank Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Neha Khan (Prakash Padia,J.) Dharampal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 27 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad