Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55830 (PNJ)

RAGHBIR SINGH v. ANKUR GUPTA AND OTHERS

COCP/2037/2024 · 2025-01-22

Harkesh Manuja

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

148 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA RAGHBIR SINGH ANKUR GUPTA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Nihal S. Choudhary, Mr. Arun Beniwal, Sr. DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA Learned state counsel on Sukhvinder Singh, Sector Superintendent the due amount towards benefit released in his favour, however, the interest component shall be remitted to him within two weeks from today. In view of the aforesa does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i. of revival application. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 22.01.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: RAGHBIR SINGH Versus ANKUR GUPTA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Nihal S. Choudhary, Advocate for the Mr. Arun Beniwal, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned state counsel on telephonic Singh, Sector Superintendent the due amount towards benefits payable to the petitioner stands released in his favour, however, the interest component shall be remitted to him within two weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be ty to seek revival of the contempt petition the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i. of revival application. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2037-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 22, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Beniwal, Sr. DAG, Haryana. telephonic instructions from Dr. Singh, Sector Superintendent-1, GLF, Hisar submits that payable to the petitioner stands released in his favour, however, the interest component shall be remitted to him within two weeks from today. id, learned counsel for the petitioner in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) January 22, 2025 from Dr. submits that payable to the petitioner stands released in his favour, however, the interest component shall be id, learned counsel for the petitioner in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner e. on the first date of listing TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.01.24 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document