Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55830 (AP)

PUSA MADHAVA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/27322/2025 · 2025-10-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

\ APHC010522592025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27322 OF 2025 Between: Sri Pusa Madhava Reddy, s/o Seetharami Reddy, Occupation agriculture cooly and agriculture village Mittapalle village post Madanapalle mandalam age about 62 years, d.no. 15-47, eguvamittapalle annamayya district ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, reptd by its Principal Secretary Dept, of Home, Secretariat Velagapudi village, Amaravathi, Guntur district Andhra Pradesh Pin code 522238 2. The District Superintendent, of Police Annamayya District at Rayachoty 3. The Dy Superintendent, of Police Madanapalle Annamayya 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Madanapalle (rural), Taluka office Opp.B.T.College Bangalore Road, Madanapalle, Petitioners 5. Sri Kala Venkata Rao, s/o not known, age 45 years. Circle Inspector of Police Madanapalle (rural), Taluka office Bangalore Road, Madanapalle, Annamayya district 6. P Venkatramana, s/o Penubadi lakshmanna Engineer Panchyat Raj Department aged 54 years, D.No. 3-161-28-11, SBI colony, Bandamedakammapalle/BK Palle Madanapalle town Annamayya district. district campus, Annamayya district Opp.B.T.College campus. occupation - Assistant 7 / I 7. P. Saradamma, W/o. P. Venkatramana, aged 48 years, D.No.3-161-28-11, SBI Colony, Bandamedakammapalle/BK Palle, Madanapalle town Annamayya District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or Direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent no. 4/ Cl of Police Madanapalle Rural of Annamayya district in trying to interfere into civil disputes between the R6 and R7 and forcing the petitioner and his family to go for a compromise with R6 and R7 and forcing petitioner to give up his right, title, possession and claims etc on the land that belongs to the petitioner and his family since decades in sy.no. 90 Extent Ac. 1-50 cents and also the land in syno. 101/2 Ac. 0-50 cents of govt land Chinnathippasamudram/CTM village of Madanapalle Mandalam Annamayya District and forcing writ petitioner to put signatures on empty bond and white papers and also R4 refusing to take any complaint that presented by the petitioner against the Respondent no. 6 and 7 and putting the petitioner under threat perception as illegal arbitrary unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent no 4 not to insist the petitioner to go for a compromise with R6 and R7 and not to ask petitioner to put signature on compromise petition etc, with R6 and R7 and direct R4 not to force petitioner or his family to accept his terms and conditions with regards their landed properties and further direct R4 to receive any complaint that would be lodged, given by petitioner against the R6 and R7 herein and register the same as per law and R4 not to interfere into civil disputes between petitioner and R6 and R7 and finally direct the Respondent no.4 not to ask the petitioner to go to the police station without following due process of law, and not to threaten the petitioner in any manner. in of was / / f r lA NO: 1 OF 2025 / Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents in particular the Respondent no. 4 the Cl of Police Madanapalle Rural to not to call for the petitioner to the police station and not to threaten the petitioner and not to insist petitioner to go for a compromise and not to interfere into the civil disputes between petitioner and R6 and R7. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S S BHATT Counsel for the Respondents No.1,2,3,4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.5 to 7: — The Court made the following order: 1 APHC010522592025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27322/2025 Between; 1.PUSA MADHAVA REDDY, S/0 SEETHARAMI REDDY AGE ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCCUPATION AGRICULTURE COOLY AND D.NO. 15-47, EGUVAMITTAPALLE VILLAGE MADANAPALLE MANDALAM AGRICULTURE MITTAPALLE VILLAGE POST ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. REPTD BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPT, OF HOME, SECRETARIAT VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH PIN CODE 522238 2.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT DISTRICT AT RAYACHOTY 3.THE DY SUPERINTENDENT, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT VELAGAPUDI OF POLICE ANNAMAYYA OF POLICE MADANAPALLE 4.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MADANAPALLE (RURAL) TALUKA OFFICE CAMPUS. OPP.B.T.COLLEGE BANGALORE ROAD, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT PETITIONERS 5.SRI KALA VENKATA RAO, S/0 NOT KNOWN CIRCLE AGE 45 YEARS. INSPECTOR OF POLICE MADANAPALLE (RURAL) TALUKA OFFICE CAMPUS, ROAD, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT OPP.B.T.COLLEGE BANGALORE T 2 6.P VENKATRAMANA, S/0 PENUBADi ASSISTANT ENGINEER PANCHYAT YEARS, lakshmanna occupation - RAJ DEPARTMENT AGED 54 COLONY, TOWN D.NO. 3-161-28-11 BANDAMEDAKAMMAPALLE/BK PALLE MADANAPALLE ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. mauanaPALLE SBI ■..RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SSBHATT Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 3 the honourable dr justice VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27322 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for; “...pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent no. 4/ Cl of Police Madanapalle Rural of Annamayya district in trying to interfere into civil disputes between the R6 and R7 and forcing the petitioner and his family to go for a compromise with R6 and R7 and forcing petitioner to give up his right, title, possession and claims etc on the land that belongs to the petitioner and his family since decades in Sy.no. 90 Extent Ac. 1-50 cents and also the land In Syno. 101/2 Ac. 0-50 cents of govt land in ChInnathIppasamudram/CTM village of Madanapalle Mandalam of Annamayya District and forcing writ petitioner to put signatures on empty bond and white papers and also R4 refusing to take any complaint that presented by the petitioner against the Respondent No. 6 and 7 and putting the petitioner under threat perception as Illegal arbitrary, unconstitutional and conseguently direct the respondent No. 4 not to Insist the petitioner to go for a compromise with R6 and R7 and not to ask petitioner to put signature on compromise petition etc, with R6 and R7 and direct R4 not to force petitioner or his family to accept his terms and conditions with regards their landed properties and further direct R4 to receive any complaint that would be lodged, given by petitioner against the R6 and R7 herein and register the as per law and R4 not to interfere Into civil disputes between petitioner and R6 and R7 and finally direct the Respondent no. 4 not to ask the petitioner to go to the police station without following due process of law, and not to threaten the petitioner In any manner and pass....” was same / 4 2. Heard Sri S.S.Bhatt, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent police are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. He would further submit that the respondent police threatening the petitioner to compromise in the civil disputes. The police are not receiving the complaint given by the petitioner against the unofficial respondents. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents would submit that the Court may pass appropriate Orders. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a complaint before the District Police Complaints Authority to work out his remedy. The Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. the \ 3. are 4. 5. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M SRINIVAS assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Dept, of Home, Secretariat Velagapudi village, Amaravathi, Guntur district Andhra Pradesh Pin code 522238 2. The District Superintendent, of Police Annamayya District at Rayachoty 3. The Dy Superintendent, of Police Madanapalle Annamayya district 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Madanapalle (rural), Taluka office campus Opp.B.T.College Bangalore Road Petitioners 5. Sri Kala Venkata Rao, s/o not known, age 45 years. Circle Inspector of Police Madanapalle (rural), Taluka office Bangalore Road, Madanapalle, Annamayya district 6. Sri P Venkatramana, s/o Penubadi lakshmanna Engineer Panchyat Raj Department aged 54 years, D.No. 3-161-28-11, SBI colony, Bandamedakammapalle/BK Palle Madanapalle town Annamayya district. 7.Sri P. Saradamma, W/o. P. Venkatramana, aged 48 SBI Colony, Bandamedakammapalle/BK Palle, Annamayya District. 8. One CC to SRI. S S BHATT, Advocate [OPUC] 9. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 10. Two CD Copies Madanapalle, Annamayya district Opp.B.T.College campus. occupation - Assistant years, D.No.3-161-28- Madanapalle town 11. nm \ \ HIGH COURT DATED:08/10/2025 \ \ \ ORDER WP NO. 27322 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS