1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 30909 of 2025 Basir Mohammad `…. Petitioner Represented by Mr. U.C.Mohanty, Advocate -Versus - The Collector and D.M., Puri & Ors …. Opposite Parties Represented by Mr. S.N.Pattnaik, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 11.03.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Mr. Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner files copy of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court of India on 02.11.1958 in Civil Appeal No. 3177 of 1982. The same be kept on record. A copy of the judgment is handed over to Mr. Pattnaik, learned AGA. 3. Learned State counsel has obtained written instructions from the Tahasildar, Puri vide letter dated 10.03.2026, inter alia, stating as follows: “It is pertinent to mention here that after going through the contents of the writ petition, it was inferred that the immediate cause of filing of the aforesaid objection was in relation to the Letter No. 14113 dated 25.09.2025 issued by the Deputy Administrator (Revenue), Shree Jagannath Temple Office, Puri to the undersigned; where the suit land has been referred to as an estate under Sateishi Hazari Mahal along with a request for correction of Order No. 02. 2 | P a g e R.O.R. of the suit land in the name of the Shree Jagannath Mahaprabhu Bije Puri Marfit Shree Mandira Parichalana Committee Puri. It is to submit here that the undersigned shall take necessary steps for scheduling a hearing by issuing notices to both the parties viz. the petitioner & other legal heirs of the deceased R.T. and the Deputy Administrator (Revenue), Shree Jagannath Temple Office, Puri for disposal of the objection as per law within a period of 15 (fifteen) days.” 4. Mr. U.C.Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Civil Appeal having been dismissed, the case land needs to be recorded in favour of the petitioner. 5. This Court would not like to express any opinion as the matter is scheduled for hearing before the Tahasildar, Puri. It is needless to mention that the judgment of the Supreme Court shall be taken note of by the Tahasildar during the scheduled hearing. 6. The writ application is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Puri to dispose of the objection as undertaken within four weeks by passing a reasoned order after hearing all parties. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Deepak