Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5583 (GAU)

PRAFULLA BARMAN and 8 ORS. v. SARALA BARMAN and 6 ORS.

RSA/70/2013 · 2025-05-26

Devashis Baruah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010005682013 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RSA/70/2013 PRAFULLA BARMAN and 8 ORS. 2: PRATAP BARMAN 3: BIMAL BAMAN ALL THREE ARE SONS OF LATE BANGO BARMAN 4: SMTI PRADIPA PRIYA BARMAN W/O LATE BICHITRA BARMAN 5: NRIPEN BARMAN 6: BASANTA BARMAN 7: LOHIT BARMAN GUBINDA BARMAN 8: TAPAN BARMAN NOS. 5 OT 9 ARE THE SONS OF LATE BICHITRA BARMAN ALL THE RESIDENTS OF VILL. KASHIMPUR MOUZA-NATUN DEHAR DIST.NALBARI ASSAM VERSUS Page No.# 2/3 SARALA BARMAN and 6 ORS. W/O LATE GOPESWAR BARMAN 2:MAHESH BARMAN 3:HITISH BARMAN NOS. 2 AND 3 ARE SONS OF LATE GOPESWAR BARMAN VILL.KASHIMPUR MOUZA NATUN DEHAR DIST. NALBARI ASSAM. 4:STRUCK OFF VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 1/9/2014 5:STRUCK OFF VIDE HONBLE COURTS ORDER DATED 1/9/2014 6:STRUCK OFF VIDE HONBLE COURTS ORDER DATED 1/9/2014 7:STRUCK OFF VIDE HONBLE COURTS ORDER DATED 1/9/201 Advocate for the appellant(s): None appears Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. PM Talukdar B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 27.05.2025 Page No.# 3/3 None appears on behalf of the appellant on call. 2. Mr. PM Talukdar, the learned counsel who appears on behalf of the respondents. 3. It appears, therefore, that the appellants had lost interest in the instant proceedings, for which, the instant appeal stands dismissed for default. 4. The records be returned back by the Registry after 90 days from the date of the present order. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant