M/S.POINEER BUILDERS COMPANY v. G.ADINARAYANA & ANR
CMA/952/2010 · 2025-12-07
R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55828 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55828 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010444602010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 952/2010 Between:
1. M/S.POINEER BUILDERS COMPANY, REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, VIDE REGD NO.47/2006 DT.02.03.2003, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER: K.CHIDAMBARAPPA S/O.KULLAYAPPA, HINDU, AGED 54 YEARS, BUSINESS O/O.REGD OFFICE:11/117, SAI NAGAR, ANANTAPUR. R/O.D.NO.11/888, ARAVINDA NAGAR, ANANTAPUR.
...APPELLANT AND
1. G ADINARAYANA ANR, S/O.G.CHALAPATHI, HINDU R/O.D.NO.12-1- 499, ASHOKNAGAR, ANANTAPUR.
2. G NAGARAJU, S/O.G.CHALAPATHI, HINDU BUSINESS R/O.BALAJI HEIGHTS, JESUS NAGAR, ANANTAPUR.
...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CMAMP 2214 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 143 days in representing the appeal
2
IA NO: 2 OF 2010(CMAMP 2297 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the order, dated 19-1-2010 in OP.NO. 166 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the District Judge, Anantapur pending disposal of the appeal Counsel for the Appellant:
1. ADDEPALLI SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K UDAYA SRI
2. N RANGA REDDY
3
The Court made the following order: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Raghunandan Rao)
Sri Nooka Jagannadham, learned counsel representing Sri Addepalli Suryanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause does not survive in this civil miscellaneous petition.
Recording the submission of learned counsel, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 08.12.2025 KA
4
97 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 952/2010 Date: 08.12.2025 KA