CRM-M-25787-2025 - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 129 CRM-M-25787-2025 Date of decision: 15.07.2025 KANWALJEET SINGH ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present : Mr. M.S. Bindra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Madaan, Sr. DAG, Punjab. SANJAY VASHISTH. J.(Oral) 1. Petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for quashing of FIR No. 146, dated 12.10.2024, u/s 333, 115(2), 191(3), 190, 324(4), 351(2) of BNS, 2023, registered at P.S. City Jalalabad, District Fazilka, and the consequential proceedings arising therefrom 2. On 13.05.2025, following order was passed:- “Petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for quashing of FIR No. 146, dated 12.10.2024, u/s 333, 115(2), 191(3), 190, 324(4), 351(2) of BNS, 2023, registered at P.S. City Jalalabad, District Fazilka, and the consequential proceedings arising therefrom. On the very outset, learned State counsel submits that he needs some time to verify the status of the final investigation. List again on 15.07.2025. "" 3. Learned State counsel was granted time to verify the status of final investigation. AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.07.16 13:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CRM-M-25787-2025 - 2- 4. Reply dated 14.07.2025 by way of an affidavit of Jatinder Singh Gill, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police Sub Division, Jalalabad has been filed on behalf of respondent-State. The same is taken on record. 5. From the said reply, learned State counsel reads out paragraph No.7, to say that on investigation of the impugned FIR, cancellation report has already been prepared and same has already been presented before the concerned Court on 20.05.2025 and the proceedings are fixed for 24.07.2025. 6. In view of the stand taken in the above-mentioned reply, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned Court, where the cancellation report has already been submitted, to finalize the decision within two weeks from today. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to seek recall of today’s order for the purpose of revival, if any cause of action survives or if any adverse order is passed against the interest of the petitioner. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 15.07.2025 JUDGE amandeep Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.07.16 13:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment