APHC010658672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33978/2025 Between: 1. MADHU MADHAVI, W/O.VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O.VIDHYA NAGAR, BADWEL TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MYDAKUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , MYDAKUR RURAL POLICE STATION YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , B-MATTAM POLICE STATION, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. SRINIVASULU REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN, OCC NEWS REPORTER, SOMAPURAM VILLAGE, MAYDAKUR MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. SUDHAKAR REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN, OCC NEWS REPORTER, GANGIREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, B-MATTAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly, in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in interfering with the possession of the schedule property of the petitioner i-n Sy.No.130 to an extent of Ac.0.80 cents-situated in Nagisettipalli Village, B-Mattam Mandal, YSR Kadapa District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural-justice and' consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the schedule property, of the petitioner in Sy.No.130 to an extenbof Ac.0.8 cents situated in Nagisettipalli Village, B-Mattam Mandal, YSR Kadapa District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y MAHA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue a writ order or direction more particularly, in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in interfering with the possession of the schedule property of the petitioner i-n Sy.No.130 to an extent of Ac.0.80 cents-situated in Nagisettipalli Village, B-Mattam Mandal, YSR Kadapa District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural-justice and' consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the schedule property, of the petitioner in Sy.No.130 to an extenbof Ac.0.8 cents situated in Nagisettipalli Village, B-Mattam Mandal, YSR Kadapa District and pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record written instructions and would submit that respondent Police did not summon the petitioner or threatened him to settle the civil disputes with the unofficial respondents, Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties, and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed to follow due process of law with regard to the subject matter. No order as to costs. 3 Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 08.12.2025 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 33978 of 2025 08.12.2025 Mjl /*