Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55817 (AP)

Andhra Pradesh Olympic Association v. The Union of India

WP/27888/2018 · 2025-11-20

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010585402018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 27888/2018 Between: 1. ANDHRA PRADESH OLYMPIC ASSOCIATION, REP.BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, R.K.PURUTHOTHAM, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 19-588/4, MESONIC COOPERATIVE HOUSING COLONY, NEAR MESONIC GROUND, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,MINISTRY OF SPORTS AND YOUTH SERVICES, NEW DELHI. 2. THE INDIAN OLYMPIC ASSOCIATION, REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT, OLYMPIC BHAVAN, B-29, QUTUB INSTITUTIONAL AREA, NEW DELHI-110 016. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent failing to communicate the letter bearing No.IOA/SAGM/1096-2018/2396 dt.25.7.2018 proposing to conduct a Special General Body Meeting of the 2nd respondent at New Delhi without the presence of the petitioner herein as bad, arbitrary, capricious and besides being high handed ignorance of the Award No.1/2017 dt.24.12.2017 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal pursuant to the directions of this Honourable Court in W.P.No.15255 of 2016 and 2 JS, J W.P.No.27888/2018 W.P.No.17965 of 2015 dt.5.7.2017 with a consequential direction against the 2nd respondent to herewith send all the communications besides extending all the privileges and benefits to the petitioner to represent the State of Andhra Pradesh before the 2nd respondent or such other body of National or International repute as may be necessary from time to time on the strength of Award No.1/2017 dt.24.12.2017 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal pursuant to the directions of this Honourable Court in W.P.No.15255 of 2016 and W.P.No.17965 of 2015 dt.5.7.2017 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent herein to permit the petitioner herein to participate in the Special General Body Meeting of the 2nd respondent to be held on 10.8.2018 at 9.30 A.M. at the Oval Hayath Regency, New Delhi, representing the State of Andhra Pradesh and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ERANKI PHANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. NAMAVARAPU R RAO(CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) 2. R N HEMENDRANATH REDDY 3 JS, J W.P.No.27888/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 21.11.2025 SCH 4 JS, J W.P.No.27888/2018 326 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 27888/2018 Date: 21.11.2025 SCH