APHC010009712024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 668/2024 Between: 1. SRI BORIGORLA VALARAJU, S/O. POLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. GUTLA. UMMADIVARAM VILLAGE, TRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, YERRAGONDAPALERN CIRCLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TRIPURANTHAKAM TOWN POLICE STATION, TRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRIC 6. SRI SEELAM VENKATESWARLU, S/O. LATE. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. MURTHINJAPURANI VILLAGE, NUZENDLA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 3 in not taking any action against the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 who are interfering in Civil Disputes between the petitioner and 6th Respondent is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 not to interfere in Civil Disputes between the petitioner and 6th Respondent and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 not to interfere in Civil Dispute between the petitioner and 6til Respondent pending disposal of the writ petition before this Honorable Court and pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to file the Counter affidavit of petitioner in W.P. No. 668 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MD SALEEM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. P S P SURESH KUMAR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 668 of 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 3 in not taking any action against the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 who are interfering in Civil Disputes between the petitioner and 6th Respondent is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 not to interfere in Civil Disputes between the petitioner and 6th Respondent.…” 2. Heard Sri Md.Saleem, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri P.S.P.Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No.6 and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent- police are interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that basing on the complaint of the respondent No.6, a case was registered in Cr.No.244 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 427 r/w 34 of IPC against the petitioner and 2 others. He would further submit that the police never interfered in the civil disputes 4 between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent, except registering the above said crime against the petitioner. 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. However, the police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the crime which has been registered against the petitioner. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.12.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.668 of 2024 Dated.05.12.2025 UPS 259