Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:58277
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6191 of 2025 1 - Raja Ram Vishwakarma S/o Late Shri Guruprasad Vishwakarma Aged About 64 Years R/o Village - Parri, Tehsil - Surajpur, District - Surajpur (C.G.) 2 - Priyesh Vishwakarma S/o Shri Raja Ram Vishwakarma Aged About 38 Years R/o Village - Parri, Tehsil - Surajpur, District - Surajpur (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Sonpa Vishwakarma W/o Shri Brijesh Vishwakarma Aged About 40 Years R/o Village - Parri, Tehsil - Surajpur, District - Surajpur (C.G.) 4 - Hridyesh Vishwakarma S/o Shri Raja Ram Vishwakarma Aged About 34 Years R/o Village - Parri, Tehsil - Surajpur, District - Surajpur (C.G.)
... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Koriya (Baikunthpur) District - Koriya (C.G) 3 - Tehsildar Patna District - Koriya (C.G) 4 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Baikunthpur District - Koriya (C.G) 5 - Vishnukant S/o Shri Amrit Prasad Aged About 40 Years R/o Village - Targawa, Tehsil - Patna, District - Koriya (C.G.)
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Surfuraz Khan, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Priyanshu Shukla, Panel Lawyer
2 SB:
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
ORDER ON BOARD 02/12/2025
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following relief(s):-
“10.1. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a suitable Writ (s), Order (s), Direction (s), by commanding the respondent authorities, particularly Respondent No. 3 (Tehsildar Patna) to conclude the proceeding in Revenue Case No. 202508013300004/B- 121/2024-25 within a time frame. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records from the court below for its kind perusal; 10.3 Any other relief, which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.”
2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage.
3. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/-/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY