Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:75318 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6326 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bipin,Prabhakar Awasthi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shrinath Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.P. Rai holding brief of Shrinath, on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3. 2. This Court has passed following order in Writ Petition No.6209 of 2025, Smt. Archana Sahu Vs. State of U.P. & Ors, Neutral Citation No.2025:AHC:73516, which was disposed of vide order dated 7.5.2025, wherein same impugned order was under challenge. Aforesaid order is reproduced hereinafter: "1. Heard Sri Avijit Saxena, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Shrinath, learned counsel for B.S.A. 2. The impugned order is an Office Memorandum, wherein punishment order is under the heading of Saransh of Speaking Order, however, learned counsel for B.S.A. on basis of instruction submits that now the complete Speaking Order is being uploaded under the said heading duly signed by concerned respondent and there is no other speaking order. In aforesaid circumstances, the respondent is directed to correct the heading from 'Saransh of Speaking Order' to 'Speaking Order' in website. 3. The impugned order is typed in continuity without proper formatting i.e. Line gap is very less, font size is very small and paragraphs are in continuation, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that concerned respondent will provide a copy of impugned order wherein proper formatting is used. A copy of order shall be provided to petitioner within two weeks. 4. The respondent No.1 is directed to look into the matter that order uploaded on website should be readable that proper formatting is being used and if possible order is uploaded in PDF format or attached as an attachment. " 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for a period of two weeks, punishment to transfer the petitioner to another place may be stayed and he refers Special Appeal No.208 of 2025, wherein in a similar circumstance, an interim order was granted on 16.4.2025 . 4. In the aforesaid circumstances, it is observed that in case the petitioner has not taken charge at the transferred place, he may not be insisted to do so. 5.This writ petition is disposed of in terms of Smt. Archana Sahu (supra). Order Date :- 9.5.2025 SB Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad