Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5581 (JHR)

PUNAM KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./541/2025 · 2025-07-18

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.541 of 2025 ------ Punam Kumari aged about 30 years wife of Late Mithilesh Prasad Resident of Village Dantar, Basisth Nagar, P.O. & P.S. B. Nagar, District Chatra. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shivdutt Prasad son of Late Rameshwar Saw. 3. Vijay Prasad @ Antu son of Shivdutt Prasad. Both 2 and 3 are resident of Village- Dantar, Basisth Nagar, P.O. & P.S. B. Nagar, Dist. Chatra. 4. Prem Prakash Gupta, son of Lakhan Saw, resident of village Rajan, P.O. and P.S. Guruwa, District Gaya (Bihar). … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Akshay Yadwendra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P. For the OP 2 to 4 : Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate ------ Order No:-04 Dated:-01-08-2025 Perusal of the record reveals that this Cr.M.P. was listed before this Bench on 18.07.2025 and the same was disposed of on the same date, but due to printing error, the cost of Rs.2,000/- by the petitioner to the opposite party no.2 to 4 through their counsel appearing in the record has erroneously been mentioned as ‘Rs.5,000/-’ appearing in the penultimate paragraph of the said order. Accordingly, the figure of Rs.5,000/- appearing in the penultimate paragraph of the said order dated 18.07.2025 passed in the said Cr.M.P. is modified as ’Rs.2,000/-’ and this order be treated as a part of the said order dated 18.07.2025 passed in this Cr.M.P. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/