Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55808 (AP)

PAMU SRINIVAS v. STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ

WP/2551/2023 · 2025-12-21

Ravi Cheemalapati

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010050532023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2551/2023 Between: 1. PAMU SRINIVAS, S/O SURYARAO AGE 40 YEARS, DAILY WAGER, R/O D.NO 4-23 PALLAPULANKA HAMLET OF ADDANKIVARILANKA, PANCHAYAT, KAPILESWARAPURAMMANDAL, DR B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. PAMU CHINA, S/O CHANDRA RAO AGE 49 YEARS R/O D.NO 4- 23 ADDANKIVARILANKA, PANCHAYATKAPILESWARAPURAMMANDAL, DR B.R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A P ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT OFFICE ADDANKIVARI LANKA, (V) KAPILESWARAPURAM, DR B.R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT,ANDHRA PRADESH 3. TARITLA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O VERRIYYA, AGE 53 YEARS,R/O D.NO 3-72, P ADDANKIVARILANKA KAPILESWARAPURAM MANDAL, DR B.R AMBEDKAR 2 KONASEEMA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus. Directing the 3rd respondent to pay rupees 5 lakhs as compensation of the damage caused to us by his illegal litigation and harassment and torture, during past 4 years and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to order interim direction by directing the 2nd respondent to file his previous enquiry report with regarding to the dispute of our site and the elementary school site including the present report made after the direction issued in WP ( PIL) No 157/22 with a detailed surveyor plan showing that our house and Elementary school site with boundaries and measurements and order Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. DOMMETI SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri V.Vijaya Vardhan, learned counsel representing Sri D.Sudhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 22nd December, 2025 RKS