Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5579 (DEL)

AMIT v. STATE GNCT OF DELHI

BAIL APPLN./2604/2025 · 2026-07-23

Madhu Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2604/2025 AMIT ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Chowdhary, Mr. Vikrant Chowdhary & Mr. Gaurav Kapoor, Advs. versus STATE GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN O R D E R % 23.07.2026 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘BNSS’), seeking grant of regular bail in FIR No. 329/2024 registered at Police Station Prasad Nagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘BNS’) read with Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. 3. Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that there is no role attributed to the Applicant except the fact that he caught hold of the deceased and the trial will take time. The Applicant is in judicial custody for the last two years. 4. Learned APP for the State submits that two-three eye-witnesses still This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2026 at 14:22:01 remain to be examined by the learned Trial Court. He has further placed reliance upon the order dated 22.07.2026 passed by the learned Trial Court, wherein the learned Trial Court recorded the evidence of PW-12, and both the vulnerable witness as well as the learned APP for the State expressed their apprehension. He further submits that there is one more involvement of the Applicant wherein the allegations are under Sections 103(1), 109(1) and 3(5) of BNS read with Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. 5. Though the testimony of some of the eye-witnesses has been recorded by the learned Trial Court, these observations of the learned Trial Court recorded while recording the testimony of PW-12 vide order dated 22.07.2026 cannot be ignored by this Court. Both the witness and the learned APP for the State expressed their apprehension before the learned Trial Court and, therefore, the examination of the witness was recorded through the vulnerable witness deposition procedure. 6. Keeping in view the nature of allegations and the gravity of the evidence, the present application is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. 7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J JULY 23, 2026/prg/m This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2026 at 14:22:01