Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55781 (PNJ)

DR S N MANIKANDAN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/13240/2025 · 2025-08-27

Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-13240-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111 CWP-13240-2025 Date of Decision:27.08.2025 DR. S. N. MANIKANDAN ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. Instant writ petition has been filed inter alia for directing respondents to conclude the enquiry initiated on the basis of complaints dated 29.04.2024, Annexures P-1 and P-2, and to conduct an enquiry in furtherance of the complaint dated 24.02.2025, Annexure P-26. 2. State counsel submits that insofar as complaints, Annexures P-1 and P-2, are concerned, matter has been enquired into and an enquiry report has been prepared. Copy of the report has been placed on record and has been supplied to counsel for the petitioner. Sheetal 2025.08.27 19:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CWP-13240-2025 -2- 3. In view of the above, first prayer has become infructuous. 4. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner does not press the second prayer. 5. In view of the above development, writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 27.08.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Sheetal 2025.08.27 19:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh