Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55770 (AP)

Bhimpalli Abaddam, v. District Collector,

WP/10198/2019 · 2025-12-03

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010229252019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10198/2019 Between: 1. BHIMPALLI ABADDAM,, S/O. NARASIMHULU, AGE- 40 YRS, OCC- VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER (UNDER ORDERS OF TRANSFER) NEELAVATHI CLUSTER, GANTYADA MANDAL, VIJAYANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIJAYANAGARAM DISTRICT, VIJAYANAGARAM. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIJAYANAGARAM, VIJAYANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI/AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to grant appropriate relief more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the Proceedings No.1857/2019/A2 Dtd.10.07.2019 issued by the 1st Respondent in so far as it relates to petitioner's transfer to Jayathi Village cluster, Mentada Mandal is considered as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, malafide and violation of Article's 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of India and set aside the same and issue consequential direction directing the 1st respondent to forthwith allow the petitioner to join as VRO Dharamavaram II Village Cluster, S Kota Mandal, in pursuance of the proceedings No.1857/2019/A2 Dtd.10.07.2019 issued by the 1st respondent 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings No.1857/2019/A2 Dtd.10.07.2019 issued by the 1st Respondent in so far as it relates to petitioner's transfer to Jayathi village cluster, Mentada Mandal is concerned with a direction to allow the petitioner to join as VRO Dharmavaram II cluster, S-Kota Mandal, in pursuance of the proceedings RC.No.1857/2019/A2 Dtd.10.07.2019 issued by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition.Dt. 08.07.2019. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.10198 of 2019 ORDER: Sri S. Karunakar, learned counsel representing Sri P.V. Krishnaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 4th December, 2025 cbn 4 73 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 10198 OF 2019 4th December, 2025 cbn