SYED REHAMAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., AND ANOTHER
WP/16590/2005 · 2025-04-30
Ravi Cheemalapati
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55763 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55763 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
L V- IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 16590 OF 2005 i Between:
1. Syed Rehaman, S/o. Late Syed Ebrahim Saheb, Aged 58 years, Ex. Oriental Insurance company Limited, R/o. Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ((DIED) per LRs-2 to 4)
2. Syed Riasaz Begum W/o late Syed Rehman, Aged 56 years. Housewife
3. Syed Reshma Rehman D/o late Syed Rehman, Aged 29 Household years
4. Syed Quaja Qummuruddin S/o. late Syed Rehman, Aged 28 Private Service. Petitioners 2 to 4 are residing at D.No. 95, MIGH, TUDA quarters A.K. Palli, Mangalam, Tirupati, Chittoor District. Petitioners 2 to 4 are brought on record as Lrs of deceased 1st petitioner as per CO dt 14^8.2015 in WPMP 22819 of 14 years ...PETITIONERS AND
1. Oriental Insurance Company Limited., Regional Office, 6-3871 , PB No.45, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabd. rep. by its Regional Manager. 2. The Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., NT Road, Tirupathi, Chittpor District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High
Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus calling for the records relating to the . impugned order dt. 31.05.20G5 from’the file of the 1st respondent and after perjusing the same, set aside the said order dt. 31.05.2005 by declaring it as arbitrary, discriminatory, violatiye of the principle of natural justice and contrary to the order dt. 16.03.2001 in W.P. 16597 of 1992 and also set aside the consequential order dt. 31.05.2005 issued by the respondent ^ consequently direct the Respondents to release the amount of Rs. 2,61,047.37 Ps. to the Petitioner by declaring that the Petitioner is not liable for any recovery of the said amount and with all other consequential benefits monetary and otherwise. > I.A. NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 21034 OF 20051 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim suspension of the impugned orders dt. 31.05.2005 issued by the Respondent pending disposal of the W.P.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2008rWPMP.
NO: 26321 OF 20081 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to hear WP No: 16590 of 2005 out of turn. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondents: SR! R VENKAT RAO The Court made the following: ORDER
e V APHC010276832005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADE3H AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 16590/2QQ5 Between: Syed Rehaman, Chittoor District, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Oriental Insurance Company Ltd And Another and Others...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.VJAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.RVENKAT RAO The Court made the following:
ORDER: On 07.04.2025 and 24.04.2025, there is no representation for the petitioners and the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today, there is no representation for the petitioners. This shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
2.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT RE^JJSTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri V Jagapathi Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to Sri R Venkat Rao Advocate [OPUC]
3. Three,CD Copies TF (gsg)
' HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025
ORDER WP.No.16590 of 2005 DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS