Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55762 (AP)

KONDAVEETI MUNEMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/13426/2023 · 2025-11-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010251152023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13426/2023 Between: 1. KONDAVEETI MUNEMMA, W/O. VEERAIAH, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O. HOUSE NO.29-310-182, ADDANKIVARI PALEM VILLAGE, NAGARAM MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT., 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NAGARAM POLICE STATION, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 4. RAMA KRISHNA, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT YEARS, OCC. SI OF POLICE, 0/O. NAGARAM POLICE STATION, NAGARAM MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KALE VIJAYA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 to 3 herein in taking action on petitioner's representation dated 09.05.2023 and taking action against the offenders even though even though MLC case was registered is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently conduct fair investigation and take necessary action as per law and pass...” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 22.11.2025 ASR 182 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.13426 of 2023 Dt.22.11.2025 ASR