Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55760 (AP)

MUNNURU VEERESH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/27402/2025 · 2025-10-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010526642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27402/2025 Between: 1. MUNNURU VEERESH, S/O. LATE MUNNURU KASHI REDDY, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. H.NO. 5-212, NAGALADINNE VILLAGE AND POST, NANDAVARAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. MUNNURU VEERANNA @ VEERAPPA,, S/O. LATE M. KASHI REDDY AGED 44 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. H.NO. 5-211, NAGALADINNE VILLAGE AND POST, NANDAVARAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. MUNNURU KASHNNA @ KASAPPA,, S/O. LATE M. KASHI REDDY, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. H.NO. 4-22 NAGALADINNE VILLAGE AND POST, NANDAVARAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. MUNNURU PALLAVI,, W/O. M. KASHANNA, AGED 26 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. H.NO. 4-22 NAGALADINNE VILLAGE AND POST, NANDAVARAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. MUNNURU VARALAXMI,, W/O. M. VEERANNA, AGED 39 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. H.NO. 5-211, NAGALADINNE VILLAGE AND POST, NANDAVARAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. MUNNURU RAMULAMMA,, W/O. M. VEERESH, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. H.NO. 5-212, NAGALADINNE VILLAGE AND POST, NANDAVARAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, AT VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AT KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, YEMMIGANUR RURAL CIRCLE, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDAVARAM POLICE STATION, 2 NANDAVARAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. K VEERA SEKHAR, S/O. KULURU MALLESAPPA, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC. FINANCE BUSINESS, R/O. H. NO. 1-156, NAGALADINNE VILLAGE AND POST, NANDAVARAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-43 7. K BASAVA RAJU, S/O. KULURU MALLESAPPA, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC. FINANCE BUSINESS, R/O. H. NO. 1-26, MANNUR VEEDHI, NAGALADINNE VILLAGE AND POST, NANDAVARAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518343. 8. K SIVA KUMAR, S/O. KULURU MALLESAPPA, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC. FINANCE BUSINESS, R/O. H. NO. 1-156, MANNUR VEEDHI, NAGALADINNE VILLAGE AND POST, NANDAVARAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518343. 9. BALIJA KISHORE, S/O. NAGANNA, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF OLD VARADHA COLONY, NAGALADINNE VILLAGE AND POST. NANDAVARAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518343. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. B V APARNA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a Writ Order or Direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in interfering into civil disputes pending between the petitioners and Respondents Nos. 6 to 8, in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.20.75 Cents covered Sy.Nos.14A (Ac. 3.00 cents). 14B (Ac.2.31 cents) 15A (Ac.9.12 cents), 15B (Ac. 6.32 cents) situated at Kanakaveedu Village, Nandavaram Mandal, Kurnool District, as illegal arbitrary, unconstitutional, without any authority of law, against the principles of natural justice, and consequently, direct the 4th respondent not to interfere into civil disputes pending between the petitioners and Respondent Nos. 6 to 8, in the interest of justice.” 2. Heard Ms.B.V.Aparna Lakshmi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondents. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the disputes between the petitioners and respondent No.6 is a civil dispute and the police are never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties. 5. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:08.10.2025 ASR 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.27402 of 2025 Dt.08.10.2025 Asr