APHC010324302021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 19425/2021 Between: 1. KEERTHI DAYANIDI SWAMY, S/O.RAMANA, AGED ABOUT. 55 YEARS, R/O.SRI BALA TRIPURA SUNDARI DEVI POTULURI VEERA BRAMHENDRA SWAMY ASHRAMAM, VANTADAPALLY VILLAGE, PADERU NLANDALAM, VISHAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. BANGARU RAMU, S/O. APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O. SRI BALA TRIPURA SUNDARI DEVI POTULURI VEERA BRAMHENDRA SWAMY ASHRAMAM, VANTADAPALLY VILLAGE, PADERU MANDALAM, VISHAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMRAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISHAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, (SC/ST ATROCITY CELL) PADERU, VISHAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ more appropriately Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents herein more particularly Respondent No.3 in harassing the Petitioners 1 and 2 herein by calling them under the guise of investigation even after referring the Crime No.6 of 2015 of Paderu Police Station as Lack of Evidence is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and against the Articles 14 and 15 of constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents herein not to call the Petitioners herein and harass them under the guise of investigation in Crime No.6 of 2015 of Paderu Police Station, in the interest of justice and may Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M A MUJEEB Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue an order, direction or writ more appropriately Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents herein more particularly Respondent No.3 in harassing the Petitioners 1 and 2 herein by calling them under the guise of investigation even after referring the Crime No.6 of 2015 of Paderu Police Station as Lack of Evidence is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and against the Articles 14 and 15 of constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents herein not to call the Petitioners herein and harass them under the guise of investigation in Crime No.6 of 2015 of Paderu Police Station, in the interest of justice and may ...” At the time of hearing, learned Government Pleader for Home on oral instructions would submit that respondent Police never called the Petitioners to the Police Station. None represented for the Petitioners. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 19425 2021 07.10.2025 Mjl /*