APHC010195772022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11507/2022 Between: 1. DHANIKALA NARASIMHULU, S/O.CHINNA SUBBARAYUDU, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC. POLICE CONSTABLE(PC NO.1409), I TOWN POLICE STATION, PRODDATUR TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINICPAL SECRETARY (HOME) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, YSR KADAP DISTRICT. 3. SRI MAHESH KUMAR, ADDL. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE(ARMED RESERVE), 0/O.SP OFFICE, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE SHO, RAJEPALEM POLICE STATION, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. N SANJEEVARAYUDU, S/O.SANJEEVARAYUDU, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC. POLICE CONSTABLE PC NO.1392 IN ARMED RESERVE, R/O.D.NO.2/82, PARTAPADU VILLAGE, RAJUPALEM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2 6. N RAMANJANEYULU, S/O.SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. POLICE CONTABLE PC NO.2725, I TOWN POLICE, PRODDATUR TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. SMT DADHI REDDY CHANDRAVATHI, W/O.VENKATARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE-WIFE, R/O.PARTAPADU VILLAGE, RAJUPALEM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... toto issue appropriate Writ, Order or direction more paticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondnets No.3 instigating the 4th respondent at the behest of Respondents No.5 to 7 harassing the petitioner to call for the police station to demand an amount of Rs.50 lakhs for family settlement with his wife, whereas the petitioner accuitted in SC No.212 of 2019 on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge, Proddatur, Kadapa District registered under Section 498-A,494, 307, 506 R/w.Section 34 of IPC, Sec.3 and 4 of DP Act as arbitrary, illegal against Art.19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and Double Jeopardy.” 2. Heard Sri Nagaraju Naguru, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that basing on the spandana complaint received against the petitioner, 3 the petitioner was called to the police station for enquiry and no crime is registered against the petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _______________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:05.11.2025 ASR 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.11507 of 2022 Dt.05.11.2025 Asr