M/S SREE ANJANEYA AUTOMOTIVES v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/34206/2025 · 2025-12-08
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55748 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55748 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010661092025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 34206/2025 Between:
1. M/S SREE ANJANEYA AUTOMOTIVES, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER VENIGALLA VENKATA SRINIVAS, S/O.
SUBHADRA RAO, AGED 52 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 60-5-10, FIRST FLOOR, FLAT 101, VENKATA RESIDENCY, GADDE VENKATA RATNAM STREET, 2ND LANE, SIDDARTHA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MUNICIPAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT
VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. 3. THE MACHILIPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 4. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MACHILIPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, in non-payment of amount due to me even after finalizing the bills, payable to me in relation to the works executed by them under under Supply and Delivery of JCB Backhoe Loader 4.60 Liters and Bucket 1 Cum Backhoe vide Agreement No 55/2024-25, dated 27.11.2024 in Machilipatnam Municipal Corporation as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to consider the payment of amount due to the petitioner in respect of execution of works forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider the payment of amount payable to under Supply and Delivery of JCB Backhoe Loader 4.60 Liters and Bucket 1 Cum Backhoe vide Agreement No: 55/2024- 25, dated 27.11.2024 in Machilipatnam Municipal Corporation, immediately pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. 2.
GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 34206 of 2025 ORDER:
1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents in non- payment of amount due to petitioner even after finalizing the bills, payable to petitioner in relation to the works executed by respondents under Supply and Delivery of JCB Backhoe Loader 4.60 Liters and Bucket 1 Cum Backhoe vide Agreement No 55/2024-25, dated 27.11.2024 in Machilipatnam Municipal Corporation. 2. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner duly executed all the works and thereafter submitted final and the final bills were duly endorsed by the competent authority. A statement detailing the works executed by the petitioner was prepared, progress of the work was recorded in the M-book. However, in spite of the completion of all procedural formalities, the payment towards the completed works has not been released till date. 3. It is further submitted that the bills submitted by the petitioner have been duly uploaded in the Comprehensive Financial Management System (CFMS), as per the records. 4. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development, the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning. 4
5. During the course of hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents does not dispute the submissions made by the petitioner with respect to the completion of the work undertaken and that the non- payment of bills is due to paucity of funds. 6. Considering the submissions, concerned respondents are hereby directed to verify and release the payments due payable to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:09.12.2025 NKA
5
243 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 34206 of 2025 Date: 09.12.2025
NKA