Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55745 (AP)

GURINADAPALLI DHANARAJ v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/36530/2022 · 2025-11-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010609202022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 36530/2022 Between: 1. GURINADAPALLI DHANARAJ, S/O). LATE DEVADANAM AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RETD. EMPLOYEE, R/O.HARITHA APARTMENT, VAMSADHARA BLOCK, 3-401, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM -45 AND ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, THE DEPARTMENT OF POLICE, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, AP SECRETARIAT, THULLURU, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, OF POLICE, 0/0. D G MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 4. THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NORTH, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHEEMUNIPATNAM POLICE STATION, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VIZAG. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of MANDAMUS by declaring the inaction of the respondents in investigating into the crime in FIR No.273/2021 dated. 04.06.2021 on the file of the Bheemunipatnam Police Station, Visakhapatnam City as arbitrary, illegal, and offending Articles 14, 19, 21 of the Constitution and contrary to the mandatory provisions of the Criminal Procedure code and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to initiate investigation in the crime in FIR No.273/2021 dated 04.06.2021 on the file of Bheemunipatnam Police Station, Visakhapatnam City pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioner, seeking the following relief: “ ... to issue any writ order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of MANDAMUS by declaring the inaction of the respondents in investigating into the crime in FIR No.273/2021 dated. 04.06.2021 on the file of the Bheemunipatnam Police Station, Visakhapatnam City as arbitrary, illegal, and offending Articles 14, 19, 21 of the Constitution and contrary to the mandatory provisions of the Criminal Procedure code and pass ...” None represented for the Petitioner. At the time of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions, would submit that after investigation of the case, Police referred the matter as „civil nature‟ and would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 36530 of 2022 05.11.2025 Mjl /*