Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body
2025 DAILYLAW 5574 (AP)
Pothula Yapethu @ Vinod, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
CRLP/983/2025 · 2025-02-07
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5574 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5574 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVA FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 983 OF 2025 Between :
1. Pothula Yapethu @ Vinod, S/o Navahan, 24 years, Bridgepeta, Gunupudi village, Bhimavaram mandaI, West Godavari District.
2. Peddapati Mahankali Rao, S/o Peddiraju, 25 years, Ambedkarnagar, Gunupudi Village, Bimavaram Mandal, West Godavari District.
3. Nethipudi Kranthi Kumar, S/o Suresh, 25 years, Ambedkarnagar, Gunupudi Village, Bhimavaram MandaI, West Godavari District. ...Petitioners/Accused No.7, 9 & 10 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Station House Officer, Prakash Nagar` Police Station, Rep. through Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. at Amaravati ...Respondent Petition under Section 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C/Under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS, 2023 is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in memorandum of grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused Nos.7, 9 and 10 on bail in connection with in Crime No.236/2024 on the file of Prakash Nagar PS, Rajamahendravaram for the offenses punishable under Sections 126(2), 324(4), 262, 253,132,121(1),109, 309(4), 351(2) r/w 49 BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and memorandum of grounds of criminal petition and upon hearing the
arguments of Sri K.V.Aditya Chowdary, Advocate for the Petitioners and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent;
APHCO10047202025 EL'E IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 983 of 2025 Between : Pothula Yapethu @ Vinod, and ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) Others AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. K V ADITYA CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order:
1. The Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is filed on behalf of the petitioners/accused Nos.7,9 & 10 seeking regular bail in Crime No.236 of 2024 of Prakash Nagar Police Station, East Godavari District. a--- I-- efzz2
2. A case has been registered against the petitI-OnerS hereI-n and others for the offences punishable under sections 126(2), 324(4), 262, 253,132,121(1),109(1), 309(4) and 351(2) read with 49 of the Bharatiya Nyaya sanhita, 2023.
3. Case of the prosecution is that, in brl-ef, is that as per the instructions of the Inspector of police, JR Puram, srjkakulam Dl'strict, the sub-Inspector of police, Laveru poII'Ce Station, srikakulam Dl'strict, along with his staff, went to BhI-maVaram, West Godavari and caught hold of Rapaka prabhakar @ prathap Reddy, who l's arrayed as accused in crime No.119 of 2024 of G.Sigadam police statl'on and all are went to prakashnagar p.s. to enquire about the other accused l'n the said crime. while they were returning to Srikakulam on the same day at about ll.30 P.M, near croma shopping Mall, RTC complex road, Rajamahendravaram, some unknown persons obstructed and assaulted them with cricket bats and sticks and also with hands and damaged the vehicles, snatched the case documents and robbed cash of Rs.10,000/-from the s.I of police and forcibly took away the vehicle keys and escaped from the Place along With Rapaka Prabhakar@prathap Reddy.
4. Heard. Perused the record. |\ `scFiZ33S3±|
5. A perusal of the material goes tO Show that basing On the confessional statement of co-accused, the pet'ltioners herein were shown as accused in the present crime. Except the confessional statement of co-accused, there is no other material to connect the petitioners herein to the alleged cr'lme. Petit-loners herein were arrested on 17.12.2024 and since then, they are languishing in jail.
Learned counsel for the petitioners Submits that the accused Nos.14,15,16 and 17 were already released on bail.
6. The learned Assistant Publ'lc Prosecutor submits that major part of the investigation is completed except filing of charge-sheet.
7. ln view of the aforesaid facts and Circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners/accused Nos.7,9 & 10 herein, on the follow-lng conditions. (i) The petitioners/accused Nos.7, 9 & 10 herein shall be released on their executing a personal bond for Rs.10,000f (Rupees ten thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned II Add'ItiOnaI Judicial Magistrate of First class, Rajamahendravaram. (ii) on release, the petitioners/accused Nos.7, 9 & 10 shall appear before the station House Officer concerned once in a week i.e. on every sunday between 10.00 a.m. and 05.00 p.m., t-Ill filing of the charge-sheet. as--I - `` Q\
8. Accordingly, the criminal petition is allowed.
//TRUE COPY// Sd/-K.TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR ©,Aat SECTION OFFICER For To,
1. The 2nd Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Rahamahendravaram.
2. The Superintendent, central Prl'son, Rajamahendravaram.
3. The Station House Officer, Prakash Nagar Police Station
4. One CC to Sri. K.V.Aditya Chowdary, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two cos to Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP [OUT]
6. One spare copy MM \. \ r- )
HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED :07/02/2025
ORDER CRLP.No.983 of 2025 ALLOWED i :_¥= T, , \4i¥of+tf, • . \}-i ----::::,-:--= _---_