K V V L NARASIMHA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/30153/2025 · 2025-11-03
D Ramesh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55738 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55738 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.30153 of 2025, DR,J
APHC010550962025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30153/2025 Between:
1. K V V L NARASIMHA RAO, S/O. AHOBA BHASKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O. 31-5-23, SUSEELA MANSION, 1ST FLOOR, PRAKASA RAO STREET, MARUTHI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (STAMPS AND REGISTRATION
DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, D.NO. 5-59, R.K. SPRING VALLEY APARTMENT, EDUPUGALKA, KANKIPADU MANDAL, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, STAMPS AND REGISTER DEPARTMENT, NARSARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, STAMPS AND REGISTER DEPARTMENT, SATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. N AMARENDRA, S/O. SRIMANARAYA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O.
ZERO CITY, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, 1ST FLOOR D.NO. 1-1-126, SATTENEPALLI POST AND TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
W.P.No.30153 of 2025, DR,J
The Court made the following ORDER:
1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or Orders or Directions by declaring action of the Respondent No. registration of land for an extent of Ac.2.00 cents inSy.No.13/1, Vadavalli village, Sattenapalli Mandal, Guntur District infavor of the 5th respondent vide Doc.No. 4508/2013 dated 29.10.2013 is illegal, arbitrary violation of Registration rules and against the Principles of Natural Justice and Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents No. 4 to cancel the registration by consider the representations of the petitioner dated 28.06.2022, 15.05.2023 and 04.05.2023 and to pass…”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 8. 3. The Full Bench of this Court, in W.P. No. 9512 of 2003, dated 24.10.2006, in Yanala Malleshwari and Others v. Ananthula Sayamma and Others, has laid down as follows:
26. Coming to the present case, as stated above, there is no prohibition under the Act for the vendor to get the cancellation deed registered. Therefore this court cannot read the same in the statute. However, the aggrieved party can always approach competent civil court.
The learned government pleader submitted that even if the cancellation deed is registered, as per the instructions given by I.G under section 69 of the Act, the
W.P.No.30153 of 2025, DR,J
registering officer is issuing notice to the earlier purchaser and also endorsing on the cancellation deed that such cancellation deed does not alter the rights. Further some of the parties filed suits and obtained status quo orders. 27. It is also to be seen that there are many disputed questions of fact, which this court cannot delve under Article 226 of the constitution of India. Further it is not as though the petitioners are without any remedy, they have alternative remedy before the competent civil court, which will be in a position to adjudicate based on the evidence both oral and documentary available on record and therefore when an alternative and efficacious remedy is available, writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked. 4. In view of the decision rendered by the Combined High Court of Andhra Pradesh in W.P. No. 9512 of 2003, dated 24.10.2006 (Yanala Malleshwari and Others v. Ananthula Sayamma and Others), this Writ Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission, granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy by approaching the competent civil court for appropriate relief. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH 04.11.2025 klk
W.P.No.30153 of 2025, DR,J
131 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.30153 of 2025
04.11.2025 kkllkk