- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28958-DB COMAP No. 528 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 528 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SEQUENT PENEMS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: STAR II, OPPOSITE TO IIM BILEKAHALLI, BANNERGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU-560 076 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MR. RAVI KUMAR ARAY …APPELLANT (BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. VIVEK B.R., ADVOCATE) AND: MR. GURUMOORTHY GANESAN AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS SON OF GANESAN SRINIVASAN RESIDING AT: ADARSH PALM RETREAT SARJAPUR OUTER RING ROAD BENGALURU-560 103 THROUGH HIS POA HOLDER: MR. R.K. RAJENDRA PRASAD …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ABHISHEK A., ADVOCATE FOR C/R) Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28958-DB COMAP No. 528 of 2024 THIS COMAP/COMMERCIAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.13(1)(a) OF THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015, PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO (a) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 25.09.2024 IN COM. OS. No.157/2024, PENDING BEFORE THE COURT OF THE LEARNED XI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, COMMERCIAL COURTS DIVISION, BENGALURU RURAL (ANNEXURE-A), WHICH ALLOWED IA No.IV AND V AND REJECTED IA No.7 AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) This appeal is filed against an order on IA No.IV, V, VII dated 25.09.2024, passed by the XI Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru in Commercial O.S.No.157/2024 by which the temporary injunction granted ex-parte has been confirmed by the Trial Court. 2. It is submitted by the learned Senior counsel appearing for the appellant that the suit is in stage of defence evidence and that the appellant is aggrieved by the observations made by the Trial Court while considering the IA seeking vacation of the temporary injunction. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28958-DB COMAP No. 528 of 2024 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondent as well, we are of the opinion that the observations made in the order passed on the IA cannot prejudice the parties in the suit. Accordingly, appeal is disposed of leaving open all the contentions of the parties to be adjudicated before the Trial Court in the suit, untrammeled by any observations in the order under appeal. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18