Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:CGHC:57120
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12693 of 2025 1 - Fulkumar Jaiswal S/o Shri Purushottam Jaiswal Aged About 46 Years Occupation- Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Presently Working At Government Primary School- Parsabhantha, Block- Bilaigarh, District- Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur
(C.G.) 2 - The Commissioner President Of Rationalization Committee, Bilaspur Division,
Bilaspur,
District-
Bilaspur
(C.G.) 3 - The Joint Director/ Secretary Divisional Rationalization Committee Education
Division
Bilaspur
(C.G.) 4 - The Collector/ President Of District Rationalization Committee District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh
(C.G.) 5 - The District Education Officer/ Secretary Of District Rationalization Committee
District-
Sarangarh-Bilaigarh
(C.G.) 6 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)/ President Of Rationalization Committee Tahsil- Bilaigarh, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 7 - The Block Education Officer/ Secretary Of Rationalization Committee Block-
Sarangarh,
District-
Sarangarh-Bilaigarh
(C.G.) 8 - The Block Education Officer/ Secretary Of Rationalization Committee Block-
Bilaigarh,
District-
Sarangarh-Bilaigarh
(C.G.) 9 - Premlal Jaiswal Occupation- Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Presently Working At Government Primary School- Pahanda, Block- Sarangarh, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Advocate KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Digitally signed by KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Date: 2025.11.26 10:57:01 +0530
For State : Mr. S.P. Kale, Addl. Adv. General and Mr. Suyash Dhar, Dy. Govt. Adv. Hon'ble Shri Justice
Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board 25.11.2025
1. Learned counsel for the State would submit that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed vide memo dated 24.11.2025. Accordingly, the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
2. In view of the redressal of the petitioner’s grievance, no further adjudication is required. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. The memo dated 24.11.2025 is taken on record. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge kishore