APHC010053552021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 200/2021 Between: 1. DAGGUBATI RAMAKRISHNA, S/O RAMACHANDRA RAO, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O KALAVA CENTRE, KARAMCHEDU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. YARLAGADDA CHOWDARY, S/O LATE KRISHNAMURTHY. AGED 47 YEARS, R/O GANDHI BAZAR, KARAMCHEDU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. YARLAGADDA SINGAIAH, S/O LATE TIRUPATAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/O GANDHI BAZAR, KARAMCHEDU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. YARLAGADDA PAPARAO, S/O SRIRAMULU, AGED 56 YEARS, R/O YAGNASALAPETA, KARAMCHEDU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. YARLAGADDA KOTESWARA RAO, S/O LATE SINGAIAH. AGED 49 YEARS, R/O NEAR PANCHAYAT OFFICE, KARAMCHEDU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI POLA BHASKAR LA S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 2. SRI D PRASADA RAO, THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE OFFICER, CUM SPECIAL CADRE DEPUTY REGISTAR, PRAKASAM 2 HDR,J C.C.No.200 of 2021 DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 3. SRI CH SIVA KOTESWARA RAO, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, THE PRAKASAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 4. SRI RAJASEKHAR, DIVISIONAL CO-OPERATIVE OFFICER CUM DEPUTY REGISTRAR, ONGOLE. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to call the contemnors herein and punish them under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for the willful and deliberate violation of the orders of this Honble court passed in lA No.1 of 2020 in WP No. 6932 of 2020, dated 13.03.2020 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. BALAJI MEDAMALLI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. HANUMANTHA RAO BACHINA 2. A JAGANNADHA RAO The Court made the following: 3 HDR,J C.C.No.200 of 2021 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 200 of 2021 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 13.03.2020 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in W.P.No.6932 of 2020. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that pursuant to the orders of this Court dated 13.03.2020, the respondents have initiated surcharge proceedings and the said proceedings was challenged before the Tribunal and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. In view of the above, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt: 05.11.2025 sj 4 HDR,J C.C.No.200 of 2021 150 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 200 of 2021 Dt: 05.11.2025 sj