- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32991 CP No. 71 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA CIVIL PETITION NO.71 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. MANGALA GOWRAMMA W/O SEEBANNA @ SEEBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT DIBBADAHALLI, BHAVANAHALLI VILLAGE, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 214. …PETITIONER (BY SRI MAHADEVASETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RAVIKUMAR @ RAVINDRA .P @ RAVI S/O LATE PUTTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, 2. SMT. PUTTA LAKSHMAMMA D/O LATE PUTTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 3. SEEBAIAH @ SEEBANNA S/O LATE PUTTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 4. NARASIMHAMURTHY @ MURTHY S/O LATE PUTTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 5. SMT. NAGARATHNA D/O LATE PUTTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32991 CP No. 71 of 2025 RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 5 ARE RESIDING AT DIBBADAHALLI, BHAVANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 214. 6. HARISH C.N. S/O NARAYANAPPA C.T. AND LATE SMT. SHARADAMMA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 7. GIRISH C.N. S/O NARAYANAPPA C.T., AND LATE SMT. SHARADAMMA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.6 AND 7 ARE R/AT NO.501, DHARMAVARA BEEDI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI, TUMKUR DSITRICT-572 214. 8. THAMMAIAH S/O VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABUT 79 YEARS, R/AT JOGIHALLI, C. HALLI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572214. …RESPONDENTS THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 24 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908 PRAYING TO TRANSFER THE EX.NO.8/2023 PENDING BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AT CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI, TUMKUR DISTRICT TO THE COURT OF HON’BLE CCH-9, XXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU, WHEREIN O.S.NO.6181/2024 IS PENDING, AS THE ABOVE MATTERS ARE ONE AND THE SAME, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING - INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32991 CP No. 71 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the appellant has filed memo seeking withdrawal of the petition, which reads as under: “The counsel for the petitioner humbly submits that the petitioner has now decided to withdraw the above petition as the subject matter of the above writ petition has become infructuous. For the reasons stated above the petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above writ petition as not pressed in the interest of justice.” 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- ____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA AT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69