Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55717 (BOM)

GAJENDRA MANOHAR TARAPURE AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER

CAW/3195/2023 · 2025-04-22

Shri Abhay J Mantri, Shri Avinash G Gharote

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 905caw3195.2023..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO 3195 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8023 OF 2017 (Shri Gajendra M. Tarapure and ors Vs. The State of Maharashtra and anr) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A.S. Ponkshe, Advocate h/f Mr. C.M. Samarth, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. A.M. Kukday, Advocate for respondent No. 2. CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATED : 22-04-2025 Respondent No. 2, Nagpur Municipal Corporation, has moved this application contending that the petitioners’ grievances have been redressed and, therefore, the petition became infructuous. Similarly, the petitioners have filed Pursis bearing Stamp No. 7/2023 dated 03.10.2023, contending the same facts. 2. In view of the reasons stated in the application and Pursis, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) Belkhede 2025:BHC-NAG:4093-DB