SHREELATA RAMANARAO BOLLA AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PSO MAUDA, PS NAGPUR AND OTHERS
WP/875/2024 · 2025-10-13
Shri Anil L Pansare, Shri Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55708 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55708 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 31crwp875.24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 875/2024 Shreelata Ramanrao Bolla and anr. Vs. Sate of Maharashtra and Ors. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Y. Khullarwar, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. K. R. Lule, A.P.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. V. M. Gadkari, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. R. S. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent No.5.
CORAM :
ANIL L. PANSARE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE :
OCTOBER 13, 2025. Learned A.P.P. submits that charge-sheet has been filed. The petitioners have remedy before the Trial Court.
2. Accordingly, learned counsel for petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the petition and avail the remedy as is available in law.
3. Permission is granted.
4. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Kahale