Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55701 (KAR)

SMT UMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/11582/2025 · 2025-08-11

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31021 CRL.P No. 11582 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO.11582 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. UMA W/O CHIKKACHANNACHARI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 2. SRI. CHIKKACHANNACHARI S/O ANKACHARI, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 3. PRAMOD KUMAR C S/O CHIKKACHANNACHARI, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, PETITIONER NO.1 TO 3 R/AT NO.05, GROUND FLOOR, SRI LAKSHMI NILAYA, 8TH A MAIN, PADMAMBA RESIDENCY, SHIVANAGARA, RAJAJINAGARA, BANGALORE NORTH - 560 010. 4. DEEPASHREE @ DEEPA C C/O. CHIKKA CHANNACHARI, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/AT NO.732/14, GROUND FLOOR, 62ND CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, Digitally signed by NAGARAJA B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31021 CRL.P No. 11582 of 2025 RAJAJINAGARA, BANGALORE NORTH - 560 010. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KUMARA K G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA WEST WOMEN POLICE STATION, BANGALORE CITY - 560 043. REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. SMT. PALLAVI K W/O VINOD KUMAR C, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/AT NO.2634, RAILWAY, PARAL LEL ROAD, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU CITY - 560 040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, ADDL. SPP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.124/2025 OF WEST WOMEN P.S. WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 24TH A.C.J.M AT BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) OF BNS 2023 AND SEC.3, 4 OF D.P ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31021 CRL.P No. 11582 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter at length, when the learned Additional SPP referring to the complaint averments has brought to the notice of this Court that the specific overt acts are attributed not only against husband but also against in-laws, learned counsel for the petitioners sought leave of this Court to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file the petition after filing of the charge sheet. 2. Leave is granted as sought for. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to approach the Court in the event charge sheet is filed. Consequently, I.A.No.1/2025 is also dismissed. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32