HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 377 of 2023 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. None appeared on behalf of petitioner. 2. Sri Navin Kumar Giri, learned counsel for respondents, on basis of instructions submits that relief sought in this writ petition has been satisfied and prayed that this writ petition may be disposed of accordingly. 3. In aforesaid circumstances, on basis of statement given by learned counsel for respondents, on basis of instructions, the writ petition is disposed of. 4. In case petitioner is dissatisfied that above referred statement is not correct, he will be at liberty to file recall or review application. September 4, 2025 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manoj Kumar Mishra, Navin Kumar Giri, Saurabh Tiwari (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Harishankar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U P And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad