M/S RAMRAJA MINERALS AND CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA
WPT/227/2023 · 2025-11-09
Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55698 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55698 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:54563
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPT No. 227 of 2023 1 - M/s Ramraja Minerals And Constructions Private Limited Incorporated Under The Companies Act 2013, Having Its Registered Office At Plot No. 289/197, Near Sadhna Mandap, Vip Road, Amlidh Raipur (C.G.), Through Its Director, Jayendra Singh Bhandari, S/o Shri Manbahadur Singh Bhandari, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 289/197, Near Sadhna Mandap, Vip Road, Amlidih District Raipur (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus 1 - Union Of India Ministry Of Finance, (Department Of Revenue) Through Secretary, New Delhi 2 - Director General Directorate General Of Gst Intelligence, Raipur Zonal Unit, 4th Floor, Rio Complex, Near Fruit Market, Lalpur, Dhamtari Road, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The General Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs North Block, Department Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance, Govt. Of India, New Delhi 4 - Additional Director Cgst Gst Bhawan, Dhamtari Road Tikrapara, Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Senior Intelligence Officer Director General Of Goods And Service Tax Intelligence, Raipur Zonal Unit Iii, 311, 3rd Floor A/b Block, Central Excise Building, Tikrapara, Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Harshal Chauhan, Advocate RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.11.10 18:14:30 +0530
2 For Respondents : Mr. Maneesh Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 10/11/2025
1. Heard.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that Additional Commissioner, Central GST has passed order dated 03.02.2025 in original, therefore, this petition become infructuous.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent has not opposed the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
4. In view of above submission made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this instant petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)
Judge Ravi Mandavi