CRWP-47 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 112 Baghel Singh State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, issuance of directions to respondent nos.1 to 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner who and also to decide his representation dated 2. of various police stations and CA Staff, Gurdaspur are continuously raiding house of the petitioner and threatening him to implicate in a false criminal case. He submits that the petiti police officials especially respondent no.4. He further submits that the petitioner has made a representation dated 22.04.2025 (Annexure P respondent no.3 in this regard, but no action has been taken 3. 4. of the respondent 4732-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Baghel Singh Versus State of Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Manoj R. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, issuance of directions to respondent nos.1 to 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner who is apprehending danger at the behest of respondent no.4 and also to decide his representation dated 22.04.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the of various police stations and CA Staff, Gurdaspur are continuously raiding house of the petitioner and threatening him to implicate in a false criminal case. He submits that the petitioner is apprehending danger at the behest of the police officials especially respondent no.4. He further submits that the petitioner has made a representation dated 22.04.2025 (Annexure P respondent no.3 in this regard, but no action has been taken Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4732-2025 Decided on:15.05.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj , Advocate, The petitioners have filed the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.1 to 3 for protection of life and liberty apprehending danger at the behest of respondent no.4 22.04.2025 (Annexure P-1). Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the police officials of various police stations and CA Staff, Gurdaspur are continuously raiding house of the petitioner and threatening him to implicate in a false criminal case. oner is apprehending danger at the behest of the police officials especially respondent no.4. He further submits that the petitioner has made a representation dated 22.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) to respondent no.3 in this regard, but no action has been taken till date. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf ...Petitioner ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Articles 2023, for issuance of directions to respondent nos.1 to 3 for protection of life and liberty apprehending danger at the behest of respondent no.4 police officials of various police stations and CA Staff, Gurdaspur are continuously raiding house of the petitioner and threatening him to implicate in a false criminal case. oner is apprehending danger at the behest of the police officials especially respondent no.4. He further submits that the 1) to Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.15 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-47 5. value of the documents direction to respondent no. Gurdaspur, to decide the representation the petitioner, in accordance with law, and grant his life and liberty is perceived. 6. any immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by May 15, 2025 vinod* 4732-2025 Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.3- Senior Superintendent of Police, District , to decide the representation dated 22.04.2025 the petitioner, in accordance with law, and grant and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be deemed to have granted any immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him. , 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Senior Superintendent of Police, District dated 22.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) of the petitioner, in accordance with law, and grant him protection, if any threat to It is clarified that this order shall not be deemed to have granted any immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Senior Superintendent of Police, District ) of rotection, if any threat to It is clarified that this order shall not be deemed to have granted any immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.15 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document