Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55692 (KAR)

JAYASHREE G.V. v. STATE BY KARNATAKA

CRL.P/13520/2023 · 2025-08-12

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31314 CRL.P No. 13520 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13520 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. JAYASHREE G.V. W/O NAGESH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 2. NAGESH S/O MUNISWAMAPPA AGED 50 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO. 1922 B.C.C.H.S. LAYOUT, VAJARAHALLI VILLAGE KANAKAPURA ROAD, BENGALURU-560109 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR C, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. STATE BY KARNATAKA THALAGHATTAPURA POLICE STATION SUBRAMANYAPURA SUB DIVISION BENGALURU REPTD BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR/GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE-560 001 Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31314 CRL.P No. 13520 of 2023 2. SMT. SOUBHAGYA W/O LATE MAHESH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT SASALAPURA MAIN ROAD, HOSABEEDI, HONNIGANAHALLI RAMANAGARA-562126 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.N.ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND QUASH THE COMPLIANT AND FIR IN CR.NO.394/2023 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE, IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER (ACCUSED NO.1 AND 3) FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S.506,34,504,120- B,419,420,448,465,471,468 OF IPC 1860 CONSEQUENTLY QUASH ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN PCR NO.710/2023 BY THE II ACJM BENGALURU RURAL AT BENGALURU IN SO FAR AS ACCUSED NO.1 AND 3/PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioners. 2. No representation for petitioners even in the second round. 3. Vide order dated 31.07.2025, a conditional order was passed by granting a week's time to comply with the office - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31314 CRL.P No. 13520 of 2023 objections. Despite the same, the office objections are not complied with. 4. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default. 5. In view of the disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE ASN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17