Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55692 (ALL)

SANTOSH GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/15220/2025 · 2025-08-17

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:140587-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15220 of 2025 Petitioner :- Santosh Gupta Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- J. N. Maurya,Anuj Pratap Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel for State respondent and Shri J.N. Maurya, learned counsel for U.P. State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA). 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for quashing the impugned order dated 10.02.2025 by which the allotment of the plot of the petitioner has been cancelled. It is further prayed for a direction to respondent no.2 to execute lease and give possession of plot no.A-53/1/42 to the petitioner or alternatively allot any other plot to the petitioner. 3. On the matter being taken up today, learned counsel for UPSIDA has placed the communication dated 01.08.2025 sent by the Regional Manager, UPSIDA to the petitioner, which is taken on record. On the basis of instructions, he states that the grievance of the petitioner is already redressed as alternative plot has already been accorded to the petitioner. He states that cause of action no more survives and as such the instant writ petition is liable to be dismissed. 4. Considering the factual situation as well as the categorical instruction, we are not inclined to proceed further in the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is consigned to record. Order Date :- 18.8.2025 SP/ Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad