Praveen Alias Pappan v. State Of Uttarakhand AND ANOTHER
C482/1721/2017 · 2025-07-31
Alok Mahra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5569 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5569 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:6747 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
31.07.2025
C482/1721/2017
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. S.K. Shandiliya,
learned counsel the applicant.
2. Mr. B.N. Maulakhi, learned Deputy A.G. along with Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. Mr. Rajendra Singh Azad, learned counsel for respondent no.2 through Video Conferencing.
4.
Learned counsel for respondent no.2 would submit that the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been rendered infructuous in view of the fact that the trial court has acquitted the applicant by judgment and order dated 05.04.2023.
5.
Learned counsel for the applicant does not dispute the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for respondent no.2.
6. In view of the above, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as infructuous.
[
(Alok Mahra, J.)
31.07.2025 Mamta
2025:UHC:6747