Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5569 (UTT)

Praveen Alias Pappan v. State Of Uttarakhand AND ANOTHER

C482/1721/2017 · 2025-07-31

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6747 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 31.07.2025 C482/1721/2017 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. S.K. Shandiliya, learned counsel the applicant. 2. Mr. B.N. Maulakhi, learned Deputy A.G. along with Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Mr. Rajendra Singh Azad, learned counsel for respondent no.2 through Video Conferencing. 4. Learned counsel for respondent no.2 would submit that the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been rendered infructuous in view of the fact that the trial court has acquitted the applicant by judgment and order dated 05.04.2023. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant does not dispute the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for respondent no.2. 6. In view of the above, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as infructuous. [ (Alok Mahra, J.) 31.07.2025 Mamta 2025:UHC:6747