APHC010567312022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 34546/2022 Between: 1. KOTHAPALLI SUBBA RAYUDU, S/O.SRI BUJANGA RAYUDU HINDU, AGED 63 YEARS, OCC-CULTIVATION, R/O.RUSTHUMBADA NARSAPUR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE INTELLIGENCE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, BHIMAVARAM, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or direction declaring the action of the respondents in withdrawing the existing security(1plus1) without any reason and notice and without taking into consideration of need and necessity to continue the security as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to continue the existing security (1plus1)and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or direction declaring the action of the respondents in withdrawing the existing security(1plus1) without any reason and notice and without taking into consideration of need and necessity to continue the security as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to continue the existing security (1plus1)and pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record, the written instructions and would submit that in the light of the report of the Security Review Committee meetings held on 21.05.2025 and 21.07.2025, there is no threat, perception against the Petitioner and for the said reason, the security provided to the Petitioner was withdrawn and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that liberty may be granted to the Petitioner to submit a fresh representation as and when required. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to submit a fresh representation to the concerned authorities as and when required. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*