- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29210 WP No. 11536 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.11536 OF 2023 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUSHMA PAREEK W/O. OM PRAKASH PAREEK, AGE 62 YEARS, OWNER OF FLAT NO.106 SAI TIRUMALA RESIDENCY, CLASSIC CELEBRITY, DODDATHAGURU, ELECTRONIC CITY, BANGALORE-560 100. 2. OM PRAKASH PAREEK S/O TARA CHAND BOHRA, AGE 67 YEARS, OWNER OF FLAT NO.106 SAI TIRUMALA RESIDENCY, CLASSIC CELEBRITY, DODDATHAGURU, ELECTRONIC CITY, BANGALORE-560 100. …PETITIONERS [PARTY-IN-PERSON (ABSENT)] Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29210 WP No. 11536 of 2023 AND: 1. SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF RURAL AND PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNAKATA, M.S. BUILDING, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, PANCHAYAT RAJ COMMISSIONERATE, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER DODDATHAGURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, KONAPPANA AGRAHARA, DODDATHAGURU ELECTRONIC CITY, BANGALORE-560 100. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA FOR R.1; SRI M.S. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R.2.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING BY A WRIT OF MANDAMUS THE RESPONDENTS MAY BE DIRECTED TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION DATED 23.05.2022 (ANNEXURE-B) IGNORING THE REPLY DATED 06.11.2022 (ANNEXURE-D) AND FURTHER CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 10.10.2022 (ANNEXURE-C1) AFTER IGNORING THE REPLY DATED 06.11.2022 SENT BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 (ANNEXURE-D), ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29210 WP No. 11536 of 2023 ORAL ORDER 1. The writ petition is filed by the petitioners party-in-person for issuance of E-Khata in their favour in respect of the property, which is the subject matter of the writ petition. 2. Petitioners party-in-person are absent. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that pursuant to filing of the writ petition, E-Khata has been issued in favour of the petitioners in respect of the property, which is the subject matter of the writ petition. For that reason, it is submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Based on the submission made by the learned counsel for respondent No.2, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE hkh. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 62