Mrs. Durga Bhavani, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/31992/2023 · 2025-11-21
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55673 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 55673 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010623092023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31992/2023 Between:
MRS. DURGA BHAVANI,, W/O. GADDAM RAJA REDDY AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O. 36-13-2/3, ADIREDDYVARI STREET. NEAR VELAMALA RAMALAYAM, INNISPET, RAJAHMUNDRY - 533103, A.P.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMTIRAVATI.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL OF POLICE, FOR THE STATE ANDHRA PRADESH AT MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AT RAJ AHMUNDRY- 533103.
4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DAWALESWARAM POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
6. MR BABJI
VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, S/O.
SATYANARAYANA, R/O. 50-2-74 STREET NO. 100 NEHRU NAGAR OPP. GOVT., COLLEGE (AUTONOMOUS) RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K GANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
2
“.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No.5 in registering a case against the respondent No.6 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No.5 police to register a case against the respondent No.6 and investigate the matter.”
2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the Petitioner has not given any representation to Respondent No.5.
3. None represented for the Petitioner.
4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to approach the Police and pursue her grievance, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.31992 of 2023
Dt.22.11.2025
Dinesh