APHC010519212004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] THURSDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 23086/2004 Between: 1. M. SUBHAKAR, VISAKHAPATNAM., S/O. M. RAMACHANDER RAO, TRACER, O/O. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DISTRICT SCHEDULED CASTE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., VISAKHAPATNAM, R/O. VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE A P SCHEDULED CASTE FINANCE CORPORATION LTD AND 4 OTH, REP. BY ITS M.D., 5TH FLOOR, SAMKSHEMA BHAVAN, MASAB TANK, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT SCHEDULED CATE COOPERATIVE SOCEIETY LTD., VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE SUPT ENGINEER, SOCIAL WELFARE, A.P. SCHEDULED CASTE COOPERATIVE - FINACE CORPORATION LTD., GUNTUR. 4. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DISTRICT SCHEDULE CASTE COOP, SOCIETY LTD., VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DISTRICT SCHEDULED CASTE, COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LT.D, 2 VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mandamus, a) Declaring the action of the respondents in not promoting the petitioner as Draughtsman Grade-III vide proceedings dt. 7.1.1995 of the superintending Engineer as arbitrary, illebgal, un Warranted and in violation of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitutionof India and also further declare the proceedings No. LC1/3252/apsc/2004, DT. 30.11.2004 of the 1st respondent as arbitrary, illegal, violative of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India; b) direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitiner for promotion to the post of Draughtsman Grade-III in Pursuance to the proceedings, Dt. 7.1.1995 of the Superintending Engineer with all consequential benefits; and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 30294 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Draughtsman Grade-III in pursuance to the directions issued by the Superintending Engineer vide orders dt. 7.1.1995 pending disposal of the main writ petition, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Coaurt may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP 104433 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 67247 OF 2012 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVASA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G SEENA KUMAR (SC FOR APEWIDC AND RVM SSA 2. M V S SURESH KUMAR 3. - The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 23086/2004 ORDER: Sri K. Srinivasa Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, nothing remains for adjudication in this writ petition. 2. Recording the said submissions, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date: 06.11.2025 ANS 5 24 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 23086/2004 Date: 06.11.2025 ANS