Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 55663 (AP)

CHALLA SREEDHAR, HYD v. J. RADHA KUMARI, KURNOOL & 3 OTHRS

CRLRC/848/2015 · 2025-05-01

Y Lakshmana Rao

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 848 OF 2015 Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., aggrieved by the order dated 28.04.2015 in Cri.M.P.No.16/2015 in F.C.M.C No.4/2014 on the file of the Family Court Judge, Kurnool. Between: Challa Sreedhar, HYD, S/o, Challa Ramachandraiah, aged about 45 years. Occupation Pvt service, R/o GF, Plot 422, Bhagath Singh Nagar Colony, Beside JNTU, Kukatpalli, Hyderabad. ...Petitioner (Respondent/Respondent) AND 1. J. Radha Kumari, w/o Challa Sreedhar, aged about 39 years, R/o House No. 46/517-4F, Budhavarpeta, Kurnool 2. C. Tanushree, D/o Challa Sreedhar, age about 11 years, Occupation Student, R/o House No. 46/517-4F, Budhavarpeta, Kurnool 3. C. Teja, S/o Challa Sreedhar, age about 8 years. Occupation Student R/o House No. 46/517-4F, Budhavarpeta, Kurnool (Respondent No 2 and 3 are minors represented by their next Friend/Mother i.e. Respondent No 1) / 4. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor Hyderabad, Hyderabad. High Court at ...Respondents (Petitioner/Petitioners) I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP. NO: 13<ia np 9n-ii;| Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including amount from salary of the petitioner pursuant to the order 28-4-2015 in Cri M.P No 16/ 2015 in F.C.M.C No 4/2014 on the file of Family Court Judge, Kurnool pending the disposal of the revision. deductions of passed on dated Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. Satyawati Counsel for the Respondents: Sri J Janakirami Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Public Prosecutor (AP) The Court made the following: APHC010287492015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 848/2015 Between: I Challa Sreedhar, Hyd ...PETITIONER AND ...RESPONDENT(S) J Radha Kumari Kurnool and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SATYAWATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.JJANAKIRAMI REDDY 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard the learned counsels for both sides. It is represented that the main case in F.C.M.C.No.4 of 2014 was allowed in part on 28.06.2016 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Kurnool. 2. The E-Courts Case status information also confirms the same. 3. \ 2 4. In view of the disposal of F.C.M.C.No.4 of 2014, nothing remains in this instant Criminal Revision Case which is filed challenging an interlocutory order in Crl.M.P.No.16 of 2015 in F.C.M.C.No.4 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Kurnool. Flence, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. SDI- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// /I SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Family Court Judge; Kurnool, Kurnool District. One CC to Sri Satyawati Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri J Janakirami Reddy Advocate [OPUC] Two CC's to The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] Three CD Copies 2. 3. 4. 5. HIGH COURT DATED:02/05/2025 ORDER CRLRC.No.848 of 2015 DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS